One file, one uploader
Your group elects a leader who merges the sections and uploads them to Canvas. Most briefs want Word, with a cover page carrying the course code, title, names and PI numbers.
4.9/5 rated by SUSS students across Singapore
A group assignment is one file, one upload and one mark, but not necessarily the same mark for everyone. Send the brief and we will show you how the marks split.
Independent academic support. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
About 2 minutes. You get a plan and a fixed quote before you pay anything.
Since 2017
Supporting SUSS students
2,800+
Group assignments supported
4.8
Average student rating
24/7
WhatsApp support
A GBA is graded work by a group of three to five students from your own seminar or tutorial group, submitted as one file by an elected leader.
Your group elects a leader who merges the sections and uploads them to Canvas. Most briefs want Word, with a cover page carrying the course code, title, names and PI numbers.
SUSS briefs state that all group members are equally responsible for the entire submitted assignment. You are accountable for paragraphs you never wrote.
The same briefs say it is not necessary for all group members to be awarded the same mark. That sentence is the most useful thing in your brief.
Published SUSS briefs range from fifteen to forty-five per cent of the final mark for the course, and twenty per cent is the most common figure. There is no single university-wide number.
| Course | Weighting of the final course mark | Group size | What you hand in |
|---|---|---|---|
| ENG335 Machine Learning | 15% | Up to 5, same seminar group | Report, plus notebook files separately |
| ANL252, ANL305, ANL310 | 20% | 4, self-formed | One report; ANL310 adds an A4 poster |
| BUS107, ECO202, LOG202 | 20% | 4, self-formed | One Word report, 500 to 600 words per question |
| PSY369 Emotion | 20% | 4 to 5 | Slide deck, plus a declaration form from each member |
| MKT363 Services Marketing | 25%, as 15% presentation and 10% slides | 4, self-formed | Live presentation and a deck, no report |
| MKT202 Marketing Management | 30%, as 10% presentation and 20% slides | 4, same seminar group | Presentation and deck |
| NCO101 Living with Community | 30% | 3 to 5 | 1,200-word report, infographic, individual worksheets |
| HRM373 Assessment and Selection | 40% | 5 plus or minus 1, randomly assigned | One group report in APA |
| NIE301 Learning with Communities | 40%, including 5 marks of peer evaluation | Not stated | Group deliverables, plus an individual peer-evaluation form |
| NCO212 The Smart City and Society | 45% | 4 to 5, self-formed | Idea, deck, 10-minute presentation, feedback form |
Often several deliverables with separate weights and separate deadlines: a report, a live presentation, a slide deck, a poster or infographic, an individual worksheet and a peer-evaluation form.
25% of the course mark, split across two deliverables and then split again inside each.
Hard limits in the same brief: fifteen minutes maximum, sixteen slides excluding cover and closing, and a deck no longer than twenty pages.
30% of the course mark, and one of the pieces is yours alone.
Each member also completes an individual neighbourhood worksheet. A member who does not complete theirs may receive no more than half of the final GBA grade.
Both models exist at SUSS and the brief decides. Most courses ask you to form a group of four from your own seminar group and elect a leader. HRM373 assigns groups at random.
Your one piece of leverage expires in week one. Ask two questions before you agree to anything: what hours can each person work, and who is willing to be leader.
You lose the selection step, so the written record becomes your only protection. One SUSS student described a group where two members did nothing and the other two carried it.
No, not necessarily. SUSS group briefs say it is not necessary for all group members to be awarded the same mark. Your instructor can adjust individual marks where contribution was clearly uneven.
Adjustment is at your instructor's discretion. NCO101 caps a member who skips their individual worksheet at half the GBA grade; MKT363 awards no marks to an absentee.
You have three levers, and two close early: rebalance the work while there is time, put the gap on the record with your instructor, and fill in the peer-evaluation form honestly.
Member A
Group leader
Two sections, the merge, the cover page and the upload. Usually also the person chasing everyone else.
Member B
On it
Sent their section on the internal deadline. Easy to overlook when the credit is shared.
Member C
Overloaded
On call, on shift, or has children. Still answering messages, so a scheduling problem rather than a free-rider problem.
Member D
Not replying
No response for days, with the deadline in sight. This is the only one of the four your instructor needs to know about.
A member who is drowning but talking can be given a smaller piece with a date. A member who has not replied for days cannot be planned around.
The hardest clause we have found is NCO212's: free riders will be expelled from the group, which results in a non-submission and a zero mark.
Early, in writing, and about the work rather than the person. SUSS briefs tell students concerned about an inequitable distribution of work to highlight it to the instructor as soon as possible. There is no separate form or appeal route.
Some SUSS courses have one and many do not. There is no single university-wide peer-assessment tool, so the instrument, its name and its weight are set per course. Several briefs carry none at all.
| What it is called | Course | How it works | Marks |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peer Evaluation form, in an appendix | NIE301 | Each student rates groupmates from working with them, submitted individually on its own deadline; the instructor sets a score from the feedback | 5 marks |
| GBA Cover Page and Declaration | PSY369 | Each member submits their own form rating themselves and their teammates, scaled to contribution so marks are awarded fairly | 10 of 100 |
| GBA Feedback Form | NCO212 | A separate Canvas submission after the presentation, with its own deadline | Not stated |
| Contribution sign-off sheet | Varies | No rating form, just a sheet everyone signs stating each member's percentage of contribution | None directly |
| Nothing at all | Many courses | No peer component; uneven contribution is handled only through the instructor and the differentiated-marks clause | — |
Find out which row you are in during week one. If it is the last row, your written record is your whole protection.
Inside your own group, working together is the task. Outside it, sharing the same work is the offence. SUSS briefs carry an explicit warning about plagiarism and collusion.
Group submissions go through Turnitin like any other, and the university reserves the right to hold a viva voce to verify authorship.
Because four people did, and the rubric notices. NCO101 awards twenty of its hundred marks for originality, clarity and coherence, and LOG206 puts twenty per cent on written communication.
Pick one word for the organisation, one for the customer, one for the framework, and write them in the chat.
Not to rewrite anyone, but to make the headings parallel, the tense consistent and the citations one style. Budget a day for it.
A sentence at the end of each section pointing to the next turns four answers into one argument. It costs fifty words.
The elected group leader, once, on behalf of everyone. They merge the sections, build the cover page, name the file as the brief specifies and upload it to Canvas.
Submission from a phone. The Canvas mobile app is not supported, so the upload needs a computer.
Replacing the file after the cut-off. SUSS states that resubmission is not allowed after the cut-off date, including the grace period.
Personal details left in the document. Keep NRIC numbers, home addresses and mobile numbers out of the file entirely.
If you are the leader, agree an internal cut-off a full day before the real one. The group's risk is concentrated in one person's evening.
In several SUSS courses the group assignment is delivered rather than written. MKT363 is a fifteen-minute live presentation plus a deck of no more than sixteen slides.
MKT363 states that every member must take part and that no marks go to a student who does not turn up.
Groups lose delivery marks in the gaps between speakers. Agree who says what at each handover, and run it once against the clock.
In MKT363 four fifths of the deck's marks are for content alignment and one fifth for design. A beautiful deck that answers the wrong question scores worse.
Most groups arrive with one of four problems: nobody knows what the brief wants, a section has not arrived, the pieces do not fit, or the whole thing needs producing.
We read the brief with you, translate each question, show how the marks split, and give you a division of work with internal dates.
One question, several, or the full set, written on your brief and rubric with real sources, then walked through with you.
Marked band by band on your own criteria, with comments where marks are being left behind.
Four sections turned into one document: one voice, consistent terms, parallel headings, a single reference list, the cover page built and the file named.
Yes. Group work is quoted on the deliverable, not per person, so four members can share one piece of work and split the cost. The quote is fixed in writing.
A report, a deck, a merge, or one question. The price follows the word count, the module and how much already exists, not the number of names.
Usually the leader. They send the brief, confirm the scope and relay the feedback, so the instructions come from one place.
Then do not do it behind them. Every member is accountable for the whole submission, so a member who did not agree still carries the risk.
Group work appears across every SUSS school, so coverage follows the schools rather than a fixed list. If your course is not below, send us the code.
These briefs tend to cap each answer at 500 to 600 words, so the marks sit entirely in the reasoning.
The marketing group assignments are often presentation-led, so the work is a deck, a script and a rehearsal. Finance and accounting briefs need the workings and the interpretation to agree.
These are the briefs most likely to ring-fence an individual component inside the group mark, and the ones where the declaration form carries marks of its own.
The interdisciplinary courses carry the most deliverables: posters, infographics, individual worksheets, progress updates and feedback forms, each with its own deadline.
A group assignment only goes to an expert who has written one before. See all experts.
Master’s in Business Administration, Nanyang Technological University
4.9/5
Specialist in: Strategic management, operations, marketing
Experience: 6 years corporate, 4 years academic
BSc in Finance, Singapore Institute of Management
4.8/5
Specialist in: Financial modelling, cost accounting
Experience: 4 years finance, 5 years writing
MSc in HR Management, NTU
4.9/5
Specialist in: Talent planning, engagement
Experience: 6 years HR, 5 years academic
BA in Marketing, Kaplan Singapore
4.9/5
Specialist in: Campaigns, segmentation, strategy
Experience: 6 years in agency, 4 years academic
MSc in Marketing Analytics, NTU
4.8/5
Specialist in: Consumer behaviour, digital strategy
Experience: 7 years in marketing, 5 years academic
MSc in Supply Chain Management, NUS
4.8/5
Specialist in: Logistics, warehousing, inventory
Experience: 8 years ops, 5 years academic
4.8 average from students since 2017 · Read all reviews
"This one deserves five stars. They helped me build my startup pitch assignment from scratch. Felt like I had a co-founder working with me. Efficient, friendly, smart."
"You can tell they care. The way they corrected my ethics writeup without being judgmental… very professional. They preserved the meaning while improving the structure."
"Final year stress = insane. Couldn't focus, didn't know how to start my strategy report. These guys helped structure my ideas so well. Like having a mentor who actually cares."
"Super chill and understanding team. They gave me tips on how to relate HR theories to my work examples. So down-to-earth and helpful."
You pay for the deliverable, not per member. Merging costs less than writing, and reviewing a draft costs less than rebuilding one.
| Per 250 words | 10+ days | 3–5 days | 24 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Brief and group plan | S$9 | S$12 | S$18 |
| Section written from scratchmost students start here | S$26 | S$35 | S$50 |
| Review against the rubric | S$12 | S$16 | S$22 |
| Merge, edit and format | S$8 | S$11 | S$15 |
Indicative rates in Singapore dollars, to show how the work is priced. Your own brief, length and deadline decide the quote, and you see it in writing first. Nothing is charged until you confirm the scope, and revisions and refunds follow our terms of work.
Send the brief and your module code. We reply with how the marks are split, what your group should do first, and a fixed quote.
Straight answers on weightings, peer evaluation, free riders, submission rules, privacy and price. More in our full FAQ.
GBA stands for Group-Based Assignment: graded work by a group of three to five students, submitted as one file by an elected group leader. It counts as continuous assessment.
Published SUSS briefs range from fifteen to forty-five per cent of the final mark for the course, and twenty per cent is the most common figure.
A GBA is continuous assessment. Every brief we have read states the weighting as a percentage of the final mark for the course, not as a share of your OCAS.
Not necessarily. SUSS group briefs say it is not necessary for all group members to be awarded the same mark, though all members are equally responsible for the whole submission.
Three to five, depending on the course. Four is the most common size across published briefs, formed from your own seminar group. HRM373 uses groups of five plus or minus one, assigned randomly.
It depends on your course. NCO212 expels free riders, which results in a non-submission and a zero mark. NCO101 caps a member who skips their individual worksheet at half the GBA grade. MKT363 gives no marks to a member who does not turn up.
Raise it with your instructor as soon as possible. SUSS briefs tell students concerned about an inequitable distribution of work to highlight it to the instructor, who investigates and decides what action to take.
Some courses do and many do not. There is no university-wide instrument. Real examples include a Peer Evaluation form worth five marks in NIE301, a GBA Cover Page and Declaration worth ten of a hundred in PSY369, and a GBA Feedback Form in NCO212.
Yes. SUSS's marks-deduction scheme names group-based assignments explicitly. There is a twelve-hour grace period, then ten marks for every twenty-four hours, and a submission carrying more than fifty marks of deduction is given zero.
It usually costs you marks. Several briefs state that a member who submits individually instead of as a group receives a ten-mark deduction. Raise the gap with your instructor first.
The elected group leader, once. They merge the sections into one Word file, build the cover page with every member's name and PI number, and upload it to the correct seminar group link on Canvas.
In several courses, yes, and sometimes the presentation is the whole assignment. MKT363 is a fifteen-minute live presentation worth fifteen per cent plus a deck worth ten. MKT202 splits thirty per cent across a presentation and a deck. NCO212 includes a ten-minute in-class presentation.
Recent SUSS briefs permit generative tools with proper attribution, meaning the tool and your prompts are documented. One brief warns that high Turnitin similarity or a high AI-writing percentage can attract further penalties.
Yes. Group work is quoted on the deliverable rather than per person, so members can share one piece of work and split the cost. The quote is fixed in writing.
Guidance, teaching, draft feedback and editing are the same support a tutor or writing centre gives, and they are most of what we do. We never submit anything on a student's behalf.
Last reviewed 5 October 2026 by the SUSS Assignment Help group assignment team.
Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now!
Or download the SUSS Assignment Help app to track your orders on the go.
Request a Call Back