Fiona Tay
MSc in Organisational Psychology, NUS
4.9/5
Specialist in: Workplace dynamics, assessment reports
Experience: 6 years HR OD, 4 years SUSS writing
4.9/5 rated by SUSS students across Singapore
You have read it six times and cannot tell any more whether it is good. Since 2017 we have read SUSS drafts against their marking rubric and rewritten what costs the most marks.
Independent academic support. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
About 2 minutes. You get a plan and a fixed quote before you pay anything.
Since 2017
Supporting SUSS students
9,500+
Drafts reviewed
4.8
Average student rating
24/7
WhatsApp support
Pick what you are worried about, and the feedback comes back aimed at it.
Checked against every rubric criterion.
See the check → RewritingRewritten, with the changes visible.
See an example → ScopeWhat a review covers, and what it doesn't.
Compare → TimingWhat is possible in the time left.
Check timing → ScopeSend the chapter that worries you.
Send one part →Yes. With the draft, the brief and the rubric, every criterion comes back met, partly met or missing, with what we did about it. No grade is promised, because your tutor marks it.
| Criterion | Status | What we did about it |
|---|---|---|
| Answers the question | Met | Introduction tightened so the position appears in line one |
| Critical analysis | Missing | Four descriptive paragraphs rewritten with judgement and a limitation |
| Use of evidence | Partly | Two uncited claims flagged; three website sources marked for replacement |
| Structure and flow | Partly | Sections reordered to follow the question numbers |
| Academic English | Met | Run-on sentences split; informal phrasing replaced |
| Referencing and format | Missing | Reference list rebuilt in APA 7; cover page and word count corrected |
Illustrative report. Your own rubric decides the rows.
Three things: comments on what a marker will take issue with, tracked rewrites of the paragraphs that cost the most marks, and a short list of what to do first.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs has five levels. Employees are motivated by different needs at each level. The company in the case has introduced a recognition scheme. This is a good idea and should improve motivation among the staff.
Maslow's hierarchy of needs has five levels. Employees are motivated by different needs at each level. In the case, frequent roster changes leave staff's safety needs unmet, so the new recognition scheme targets esteem needs that sit above an unstable base. Maslow's model therefore predicts limited effect until shift patterns stabilise, although it explains less well why long-serving staff stay, which points to team loyalty.
Tracked changes, so you can see every edit and keep your own voice.
Proofreading fixes the surface: spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting. A review asks whether the work answers the question, argues with evidence and meets each criterion.
| Assignment review | Proofreading | |
|---|---|---|
| Main question | Will this meet the rubric? | Is this clean and correct? |
| Looks at | Argument, evidence, structure, criteria | Spelling, grammar, punctuation, layout |
| Changes made | Paragraphs rewritten where needed | Sentence-level corrections only |
| Best when | You are unsure it will pass | You are happy with the content |
Feedback you cannot act on is wasted money. What a review can fix depends on the days you have left.
Structure reordered, analysis rewritten, evidence replaced, references rebuilt, with time for you to redraft.
The two or three criteria costing the most marks, plus referencing and clarity.
Formatting, word count, reference list and obvious errors. We will say so plainly.
Yes, and most students do. Send the section you keep rewriting, with the brief and the rubric. The quote covers only what you send, and the comments say how it fits the rest.
The most common one. Usually description that needs turning into judgement.
Chapter 2 and Chapter 5 come up most, and both have their own fixes. See the dissertation help page.
Checked on its own, and against the rest of the report so the voices match.
Quick to fix, and the two parts a marker reads most closely.
Five steps, and you approve the plan before any writing starts.
Your draft, the brief, the marking rubric and any earlier tutor feedback.
Criterion by criterion, with the two or three fixes that move the most marks. Then a fixed quote.
Which sections we rewrite, what stays as comments only, and when it comes back.
Comments where a marker would object, tracked rewrites where paragraphs fail, and a ranked fix list.
So you can apply the changes in your own words, with free follow-up questions under our terms and conditions.
Nobody is handed a draft outside their own subject. See all experts.
MSc in Organisational Psychology, NUS
4.9/5
Specialist in: Workplace dynamics, assessment reports
Experience: 6 years HR OD, 4 years SUSS writing
BA in Applied Psychology, James Cook University Singapore
4.9/5
Specialist in: Intervention reports, case assessments
Experience: 6 years in social work, 4 years academic
Bachelor’s in Communications, SMU
4.8/5
Specialist in: PR, campaign analysis, writing reports
Experience: 6 years media, 3 years SUSS support
BA in Counselling Psychology, Singapore University of Social Sciences
4.9/5
Specialist in: Reflection journals, intervention analysis
Experience: 6 years practice, 4 years writing
MSc in Counselling, James Cook University Singapore
4.9/5
Specialist in: Reflection papers, trauma support
Experience: 6 years practice, 4 years academic
Master’s in Business Communication, SMU
4.8/5
Specialist in: PR case analysis, business writing
Experience: 6 years corporate, 4 years academic
4.8 average from students since 2017 · Read all reviews
"You can tell they care. The way they corrected my ethics writeup without being judgmental… very professional. They preserved the meaning while improving the structure."
"You saved my skin. I had to do a media strategy analysis — which I had zero clue about — and they gave me such good direction. Loved working with them."
"Super chill and understanding team. They gave me tips on how to relate HR theories to my work examples. So down-to-earth and helpful."
"Wasn't sure what to expect at first, but wow… their help was super friendly and clear. Guided me on how to handle case studies on elderly care and made sure I included empathy."
You pay for the help you actually need. A rubric status read costs less than a full review.
| Per 1,000 words | 5+ days | 48 hours | 12 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rubric check with written feedbackmost students start here | S$38 | S$52 | S$72 |
| Language and structure edit | S$44 | S$60 | S$85 |
| Both, with the weak sections rewritten | S$75 | S$100 | S$140 |
| Second read after you make the changes | S$22 | S$30 | S$42 |
Indicative rates in Singapore dollars, to show how the work is priced. Your own brief, length and deadline decide the quote, and you see it in writing first. Nothing is charged until you confirm the scope, and revisions and refunds follow our terms and conditions.
Send the draft and the rubric. We reply with what it would score now, what is costing you a band, and a fixed quote.
Straight answers on scope, turnaround, rewriting, privacy and price. More in our full FAQ.
Yes. Send the draft, the brief and the marking rubric. You get a status for every criterion, the weak sections rewritten in tracked changes, and a ranked list of what to fix first.
Proofreading fixes spelling, grammar and formatting. A review goes further: does the work answer the question, meet each marking criterion, argue with evidence and hold together? Grammar comes last.
Most single assignments come back within a day or two, depending on length and how close your cut-off is. Send the draft as early as you can.
No. Your tutor marks it, so nobody can promise a grade. What you get is an honest read against the rubric: which criteria are met, partly met or missing.
Both. Comments explain what is wrong and why it costs marks, and the weak paragraphs are rewritten in tracked changes so you can accept, reject or rewrite them yourself.
Yes. Many students send only the analysis or the discussion, because that is where the marks sit. The quote covers only what you send.
Yes. Rewrites follow your own sentence patterns and vocabulary. The aim is your argument expressed properly, not a new voice dropped on top of your work.
A review checks that your citations match your reference list and follow the style in your brief. Verifying each source against the real publication is the citation and referencing check.
Yes, and the review includes verifying that the sources exist, because AI tools invent citations. We also flag passages that read as generic, so you can add your own evidence.
Yes. We never contact SUSS or your tutor, and your draft is used only to produce your feedback, handled in line with Singapore's Personal Data Protection Act.
It depends on the word count, the subject and how soon you need it back. You get a fixed quote in writing before anything starts.
Last reviewed 5 October 2026 by the SUSS Assignment Help review team.
Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now!
Or download the SUSS Assignment Help app to track your orders on the go.
Request a Call Back