It replaces the exam
If your course has an ECA, it will not appear on the written exam timetable. There is no hall and no fixed sitting.
4.9/5 rated by SUSS students across Singapore
Your end-of-course assessment replaces the exam, carries up to seventy per cent of the course, and has to clear its own minimum on its own.
Independent academic support. Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Singapore University of Social Sciences.
About 2 minutes. You get a plan and a fixed quote before you pay anything.
Since 2017
Supporting SUSS students
3,600+
End-of-course papers
4.8
Average student rating
24/7
WhatsApp support
An ECA is the examinable component for a course with no written exam. It feeds your Overall Examinable Score, not your continuous assessment.
If your course has an ECA, it will not appear on the written exam timetable. There is no hall and no fixed sitting.
Your assignments feed one score and your ECA feeds the other. Each has its own minimum.
There is no revise-and-resubmit. A second submission exists only as a formal re-sit, if you clear specific thresholds.
SUSS's own exam timetable lists 453 courses in the January 2027 semester under End of Course Assessment, plus 40 project and thesis courses.
453
Taken from the official timetable for January 2027. Assessment modes change between semesters, so check the current timetable rather than a classmate's memory.
40
A separate category on the same timetable, covering capstones, applied projects and dissertations. These are not ECAs and follow their own project booklets.
69
From ICT and ANL to COU, ECE, HRM, MKT, POL, PSY, SOC and TSL. ECAs run across business, technology, education, social science and postgraduate programmes.
It is open book. SUSS's own teaching guidance places an ECA in the same access category as a TMA and an open-book examination.
SUSS students describe their ECAs as labour intensive rather than essay-like. For several programmes the submission is three pieces: report, slide deck and recorded presentation.
Where the analysis lives. Word counts in published briefs run from 1,600 to 3,000 words, sometimes capped per question, and often excluding the reference list.
Usually the largest mark band
A condensed version of the same argument, marked on whether it aligns with the question. Write it first, not last.
Marked on alignment, not design
You, speaking, on camera, alone. Rehearsal matters more than the slides, and this is the piece most often left to the final evening.
The piece people underestimate
Technical briefs are marked sub-questions with no word limit. One ICT paper allocates twelve, ten, twelve, five and sixteen marks across five parts, and another splits a hundred marks across five questions in two sections.
Published SUSS briefs run from twenty to seventy per cent of the course mark, seventy being common in technology courses. Your own paper names the figure.
| Course | Weighting | Length | Shape of the paper |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICT304 NLP Foundation for Generative AI | 70%, compulsory | No word limit | Five parts, marked 15 / 10 / 15 / 20 / 5 |
| ICT302 Generative AI: Theory and Practice | 70% | No word limit | Five questions, two sections, 25 and 75 marks |
| ICT239 Web Application Development | 70% | No word limit | Marked 12 / 10 / 12 / 5 / 16, on a provided template |
| MTD105 Digital Photography Technology | 70% | No prose at all | Ten photographs, ten marks each |
| ECE362 Teacher Leadership | 50% | 3,000 words, excluding references | Case write-up 45, teaching note 10, writing quality 10 |
| HRM373 Assessment and Selection | 50% | 1,600 words, excluding questions and references | Four questions, marked 10 / 10 / 10 / 65 |
| HRM335 Leadership Development | 40% | 1,000, 1,000 and 500 words per question | Three questions, marked 40 / 40 / 20 |
Notice what the table does not contain: a standard length. A technology ECA can have no word limit while a teacher-education one runs to three thousand words.
No. Your assignments and your ECA are scored separately, and each must reach forty out of a hundred on its own. It is multiple-hurdle, not compensatory.
It depends how far below the line you land. Between fifteen and thirty-nine on the examinable side, with at least forty on coursework, you may re-sit.
Both components clear their own minimum, and the two scores combine into your grade using the weighting your course sets.
A near miss on the examinable side, with coursework above the line, keeps the door open. It is a second attempt, not a revision.
Both the teaching and every component again, including the assignments you already passed. That is why fifteen matters as much as forty.
SUSS treats a student who does not submit the end-of-course assessment as an automatic withdrawal from the course.
Every published ECA brief we have read sets the deadline at twelve noon, not late at night. A midnight habit costs you almost twelve hours.
12:00pm
What ECA briefs actually say
Nine out of nine briefs we checked set a noon cut-off: 12:00pm, 12 noon or 1200hrs. Your last session is the night before.
11:55pm
What you are used to
The familiar assignment cut-off. Carrying it across to an ECA is the most common planning error on this assessment.
Where a brief and a general policy give different cut-off times, your brief governs. Plan to the time printed on your own paper.
The same deduction scheme applies. SUSS's marks-deduction policy names the end-of-course assessment explicitly: a twelve-hour grace period, then ten marks for every twenty-four hours, and zero once deductions pass fifty marks.
On a twenty per cent assignment, ten marks off is a dent. On an examinable component at seventy per cent, with a minimum of forty, it decides the course.
There is also no later component to recover on. The ECA is the last thing you submit.
The full deduction arithmeticIt covers assignments, group work, case studies and end-of-course assessments. Quizzes, computer-marked tasks, discussion boards and laboratory reports sit outside it.
The grace period is extended only for a system fault lasting more than six hours. Work travel and National Service do not change it.
By which side of your grade it feeds, not by how it looks. The TMA builds your continuous assessment score and the ECA your examinable score.
| TMA | ECA | Timed online paper | Written exam | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeds which score | Continuous | Examinable | Examinable | Examinable |
| Timed sitting | No | No | Yes, exam length plus 30 minutes | Yes, fixed slot |
| Supervised | No | No | No | Yes |
| Access to materials | Open | Open | Open | Closed, unless stated otherwise |
| On the exam timetable | No | No, explicitly excluded | Scheduled separately | Yes |
| If it goes badly | Later components can cushion it | Re-sit only, within thresholds | Re-sit only | Re-sit only |
A weak assignment is a setback you can trade back later in the semester. A weak examinable component is the semester.
By how long you hold it. SUSS describes a timed online assignment as like a TMA or ECA but with a duration similar to a written examination plus thirty minutes.
You cannot research inside the window, so preparation happens before it: knowing where things are, having a structure ready, and having practised at the pace.
Preparing for a timed paperTime is not the constraint, so nothing is forgiven. A marker expects a considered structure and accurate use of the course material.
Recent ECA briefs permit generative tools if you attribute them properly: discipline-specific citation plus a table naming the tool, the prompts, the output and which part you adapted.
The 2023 briefs we have read carry no attribution requirement. The 2024 and 2025 briefs do, so an older sample is out of date on integrity.
Where tools are permitted, using one is not the offence. Using one and declaring nothing is.
We do not help anyone disguise machine-written work or get past detection software. We help you produce a paper that is yours.
Through Canvas, as a single Word document named in your brief's pattern: course code, assignment code, user ID, full name, joined by underscores. Hardcopy is not accepted.
Briefs say your submission will be screened through plagiarism detection software. They do not name the product, so any safe similarity percentage is invented.
The briefs do say the work is done individually, not collaboratively, and that plagiarism and collusion are not acceptable.
Have every source verifiedAn assignment tests a slice of the course. An ECA tests whether you can choose from all of it, so the skill being marked is selection.
An ECA is rarely one job. It is reading the paper, choosing the material, writing at length, then building a deck and a recording on top.
We work through each question, name the concept it is reaching for, show where the marks sit, and build a schedule to the noon deadline.
A full model answer built on your paper and its mark allocation, with real sources, plus the deck and speaker notes if your brief asks for them.
Scored question by question against the mark allocation in your own paper, with comments where marks are being left behind.
Language, structure, references and word limits, plus the slide deck, the integrity statement and the file naming.
Coverage follows the subject rather than a fixed list. Below are the codes whose papers we see most often. Send yours if it is not shown.
These papers carry the heaviest weightings, often seventy per cent, and have no word limit. They are problem sets, so the marks live in whether output, code and interpretation agree.
Word limits here are tight, sometimes capped per question, and the mark allocation is lopsided: one brief puts sixty-five of a hundred marks on a single question.
The longest papers, up to three thousand words, usually built around a case write-up with a separate teaching or practice note. APA 7th carries its own marks.
Where the submission is not prose at all. One photography paper is assessed as ten images at ten marks each, so the written rationale carries real weight.
Your end-of-course paper goes to someone who works in this subject, not to whoever is free. See all experts.
MSc in Educational Psychology, NUS
5.0/5
Specialist in: Learning theory, developmental needs
Experience: 8 years in education, 5 years writing
Master’s in Business Administration, Nanyang Technological University
4.9/5
Specialist in: Strategic management, operations, marketing
Experience: 6 years corporate, 4 years academic
PGDE in Education, NIE Singapore
5.0/5
Specialist in: Curriculum design, learning outcomes
Experience: 10 years teaching, 5 years writing
BA in Social Work, SUSS
5.0/5
Specialist in: Ethics, interventions, client studies
Experience: 5 years social sector, 4 years writing
BA in Psychology, Singapore University of Social Sciences
4.9/5
Specialist in: Cognitive development, intervention design
Experience: 7 years practice, 4 years academic
MSc in Organisational Psychology, NUS
4.9/5
Specialist in: Workplace dynamics, assessment reports
Experience: 6 years HR OD, 4 years SUSS writing
4.8 average from students since 2017 · Read all reviews
"Wasn't sure what to expect at first, but wow… their help was super friendly and clear. Guided me on how to handle case studies on elderly care and made sure I included empathy."
"Final year stress = insane. Couldn't focus, didn't know how to start my strategy report. These guys helped structure my ideas so well. Like having a mentor who actually cares."
"I don't usually write reviews but this one deserves it. Really solid help. They explained everything from GDP to fiscal tools in easy terms. Scored higher than I expected!"
"OMG I got an A! Their suggestions for my digital campaign project were next level. Felt like I was working with a creative team. Highly recommend them."
You pay for the part you hand over. Reading the paper with you costs less than writing it.
| Per 250 words | 10+ days | 3–5 days | 24 hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paper read and planned with you | S$8 | S$10 | S$15 |
| Written from scratchmost students start here | S$22 | S$30 | S$42 |
| Reviewed before you submit | S$10 | S$13 | S$19 |
| Editing and the extras | S$7 | S$9 | S$13 |
Indicative rates in Singapore dollars, to show how the work is priced. Your own brief, length and deadline decide the quote, and you see it in writing first. Nothing is charged until you confirm the scope, and revisions and refunds follow our terms of work.
Send the paper and your module code. We reply with what each question is asking, where the marks sit, and a fixed quote, and you decide from there.
Straight answers on weightings, deadlines, failure thresholds, the AI rules, privacy and price. More in our full FAQ.
ECA stands for End-of-Course Assessment: the examinable component for a course with no written exam. You complete it at home with notes open and submit through Canvas. It feeds your Overall Examinable Score.
The official SUSS exam timetable lists 453 End of Course Assessment courses for January 2027, plus 40 project and thesis courses, all excluded from the written exam schedule. Modes change between semesters.
Published briefs range from twenty to seventy per cent of the course mark, and seventy is common in technology courses. One brief calls it a compulsory component. Your own paper names the figure.
Yes. SUSS's teaching guidance places an ECA in the same access category as a tutor-marked assignment and an open-book examination, where a student can access any type of information. Recall is not what is tested.
Which side of your grade it feeds. Both are written, individual and submitted through Canvas, but a TMA builds your continuous assessment score and an ECA builds your examinable score. The two have separate minimums.
No. SUSS requires a minimum of forty out of a hundred on the continuous assessment side and forty on the examinable side, separately. It is a multiple-hurdle system, not a compensatory one.
Three outcomes sit below a pass. With an examinable score between fifteen and thirty-nine and coursework of at least forty, you may re-sit. Below that the whole course is repeated. Not submitting counts as withdrawal.
Every published brief we have read sets the deadline at twelve noon, written as 12:00pm, 12 noon or 1200hrs. Students carrying a near-midnight habit lose almost twelve hours.
Yes. SUSS's marks-deduction scheme names the end-of-course assessment explicitly: a twelve-hour grace period, then ten marks for every twenty-four hours, and zero once deductions pass fifty marks. The Canvas gradebook applies it automatically.
Not as a revision. A second attempt exists only as a formal re-sit, where your examinable score falls between fifteen and thirty-nine and your coursework score is at least forty.
Often not. For some programmes the submission is three pieces: a written report, a slide deck and a recorded presentation. Technology papers use marked problem sets, and one photography course is ten images at ten marks each.
How long you hold it. SUSS describes a timed online assignment as like a TMA or ECA but with a duration similar to a written examination plus thirty minutes. An ECA sits with you for weeks.
Recent briefs permit generative tools with proper attribution: discipline-specific citation plus a table naming the tool, the prompts used, the full output it produced and which part you adapted. Undeclared use is the breach.
Through Canvas, as a single Word document named in your brief's pattern: course code, assignment code, user ID and full name, joined by underscores. One brief caps the file at twenty megabytes.
It depends on the module, the length, how many deliverables your brief asks for and how much already exists. You get a fixed quote in writing before you pay anything.
Last reviewed 5 October 2026 by the SUSS Assignment Help end-of-course assessment team.
Facing Issues with Assignments? Talk to Our Experts Now!
Or download the SUSS Assignment Help app to track your orders on the go.
Request a Call Back